↓ Skip to main content

Parallel study about the effects of psychotherapy on patients with dental phobia determined by anxiety scores and saliva secretion and composition

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parallel study about the effects of psychotherapy on patients with dental phobia determined by anxiety scores and saliva secretion and composition
Published in
BMC Oral Health, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12903-016-0264-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. A. Naumova, S. Faber, P. Lindner, A. Wannemueller., T. Sandulescu, P. Joehren, W. H. Arnold

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the success of psychotherapeutic treatment for dental phobia by measurement of anxiety using the dental anxiety score (DAS), the state trait anxiety score (STAI state), salivary cortisol and protein concentrations and the salivary secretion rate. Primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of the data before and after psychotherapeutic treatment. Forty patients were included into the study. Twenty-four were allocated to the phobic group, 16 to the control group. Saliva was collected upon entering the dental clinic and again after three weeks of psychotherapy. The results were compared with those of a control group. The DAS and STAI questionnaires were completed at each visit. A reduction in DAS values was found after psychotherapy. However, the values remained significantly higher in the phobic group than in the controls. Similar results were found for STAI scores. A slightly higher salivary cortisol level was found in the phobic group. No changes occurred in cortisol or protein concentrations. The salivary secretion rate increased in the phobic patients after psychotherapy. It could be concluded that psychotherapy is effective in the treatment of dental phobic patients. This study has been retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (# DRKS00009552 ) on 10/19/15.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 237 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 1%
Student > Master 3 1%
Professor 2 <1%
Student > Bachelor 2 <1%
Librarian 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 220 93%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Neuroscience 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Unknown 220 93%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,466,751
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#998
of 1,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,793
of 366,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#23
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,475 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.