You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-56 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gudrun Bornhöft, Stefanie Maxion-Bergemann, Ursula Wolf, Gunver S Kienle, Andreas Michalsen, Horst C Vollmar, Simon Gilbertson, Peter F Matthiessen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 14% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,639,174
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#548
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,246
of 158,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.