You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
On the origin of the translation system and the genetic code in the RNA world by means of natural selection, exaptation, and subfunctionalization
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biology Direct, May 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6150-2-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuri I Wolf, Eugene V Koonin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 23% |
Australia | 2 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 4% |
Germany | 3 | 1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 3% |
Unknown | 175 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 22% |
Researcher | 41 | 20% |
Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 8% |
Other | 41 | 20% |
Unknown | 21 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 49% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 15% |
Chemistry | 16 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 2% |
Other | 23 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,832,984
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#55
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,678
of 83,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.