You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using ESTs for phylogenomics: Can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-8-95 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefanie Hartmann, Todd J Vision |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 8% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 117 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 23% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 11% |
| Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 108 | 70% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,697
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,924
of 95,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#43
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.