You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical review: Complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc1489 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bernd Volker Scheer, Azriel Perel, Ulrich J Pfeiffer |
| Abstract |
In order to evaluate the complications and risk factors associated with peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring, we reviewed the literature published from 1978 to 2001. We closely examined the three most commonly used arterial cannulation sites. The reviewed papers included a total of 19,617 radial, 3899 femoral and 1989 axillary artery catheterizations. Factors that contribute to higher complication rates were investigated. Major complications occurred in fewer than 1% of the cases, and rates were similar for the radial, femoral and axillary arteries. We conclude that arterial cannulation is a safe procedure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 327 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 58 | 17% |
| Researcher | 52 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 111 | 32% |
| Unknown | 13 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 227 | 66% |
| Engineering | 30 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,425,072
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,245
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,436
of 127,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them