You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications of multiple late gadolinium enhancement lesions on the frequency of left ventricular reverse remodeling and prognosis in patients with non‐ischemic cardiomyopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00734-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shingo Ota, Makoto Orii, Tsuyoshi Nishiguchi, Mao Yokoyama, Ryoko Matsushita, Kazushi Takemoto, Takashi Tanimoto, Kumiko Hirata, Takeshi Hozumi, Takashi Akasaka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 45% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,268,225
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#951
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,218
of 453,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#25
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.