You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
VCO2 calorimetry is a convenient method for improved assessment of energy expenditure in the intensive care unit
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1397-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ulrike Pielmeier, Steen Andreassen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Turkey | 2 | 12% |
Vietnam | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 33% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 58% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,703,892
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,835
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,634
of 381,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#85
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.