You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Charles Darwin’s Manuscripts and Publications on the World Wide Web
|
---|---|
Published in |
Evolution: Education and Outreach, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12052-008-0113-0 |
Authors |
Adam M. Goldstein |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Thailand | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
Other | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Researcher | 2 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 67% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2009.
All research outputs
#2,121,480
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from Evolution: Education and Outreach
#126
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,944
of 172,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution: Education and Outreach
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.