Title |
The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-016-0085-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shelley Potter, Elizabeth J. Conroy, Paula R. Williamson, Steven Thrush, Lisa J. Whisker, Joanna M Skillman, Nicola L. P. Barnes, Ramsey I. Cutress, Elizabeth M. Teasdale, Nicola Mills, Senthurun Mylvaganam, Olivier A. Branford, Katherina McEvoy, Abhilash Jain, Matthew D. Gardiner, Jane M. Blazeby, Christopher Holcombe, on behalf of the Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative |
Abstract |
Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK. The introduction of techniques to augment the subpectoral pocket has revolutionised the procedure, but there is a lack of high-quality outcome data to describe the safety or effectiveness of these techniques. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the best way of comparing treatments, but surgical RCTs are challenging. The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study aims to determine the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic RCT to examine the effectiveness of approaches to IBBR. The iBRA study is a trainee-led research collaborative project with four phases:Phase 1 - a national practice questionnaire (NPQ) to survey current practicePhase 2 - a multi-centre prospective cohort study of patients undergoing IBBR to evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomesPhase 3- an IBBR-RCT acceptability survey and qualitative work to explore patients' and surgeons' views of proposed trial designs and candidate outcomes.Phase 4 - phases 1 to 3 will inform the design and conduct of the future RCT All centres offering IBBR will be encouraged to participate by the breast and plastic surgical professional associations (Association of Breast Surgery and British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons). Data collected will inform the feasibility of undertaking an RCT by defining current practice and exploring issues surrounding recruitment, selection of comparator arms, choice of primary outcome, sample size, selection criteria, trial conduct, methods of data collection and feasibility of using the trainee collaborative model to recruit patients and collect data. The preliminary work undertaken within the iBRA study will determine the feasibility, design and conduct of a definitive RCT in IBBR. It will work with the trainee collaborative to build capacity by creating an infrastructure of research-active breast and plastic surgeons which will facilitate future high-quality research that will ultimately improve outcomes for all women seeking reconstructive surgery. ISRCTN37664281. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 26% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 21% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Finland | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
India | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 32% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Librarian | 3 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 53% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 40% |