You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Towards use of POCUS to evaluate hemodynamics in critically ill neonates: caution before adoption in this population
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03394-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrick J. McNamara, Piers Barker, Amish Jain, Wyman W. Lai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 22% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 56% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,602,824
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,743
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,184
of 451,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#81
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.