You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of sleep disturbance on patients in treatment for mental disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-12-179 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Håvard Kallestad, Bjarne Hansen, Knut Langsrud, Torleif Ruud, Gunnar Morken, Tore C Stiles, Rolf W Gråwe |
| Abstract |
In clinical practice, sleep disturbance is often regarded as an epiphenomenon of the primary mental disorder. The aim of this study was to test if sleep disturbance, independently of primary mental disorders, is associated with current clinical state and benefit from treatment in a sample representative of public mental health care clinics. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,554,648
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#964
of 4,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,216
of 185,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#14
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.