↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in early molecular networks

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in early molecular networks
Published in
Biology Direct, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-5-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ran Kafri, Omer Markovitch, Doron Lancet

Abstract

An important facet of early biological evolution is the selection of chiral enantiomers for molecules such as amino acids and sugars. The origin of this symmetry breaking is a long-standing question in molecular evolution. Previous models addressing this question include particular kinetic properties such as autocatalysis or negative cross catalysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 6%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Croatia 1 3%
Unknown 27 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 30%
Chemistry 5 15%
Physics and Astronomy 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,154,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#337
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,770
of 95,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.