You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Targeting triple‐negative breast cancer with an aptamer‐functionalized nanoformulation: a synergistic treatment that combines photodynamic and bioreductive therapies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-00786-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yi-Te Chou, Chih-Yu Lin, Jyun-Wei Wen, Ling-Chun Hung, Ying-Feng Chang, Chia-Min Yang, Li-chen Wu, Ja-an Annie Ho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Chemistry | 2 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,549,452
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#523
of 1,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,899
of 431,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#21
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.