You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy and safety of dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Ugandan children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-021-03711-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dawit Getachew Assefa, Eden Dagnachew Zeleke, Delayehu Bekele, Hanna Amanuel Tesfahunei, Emnet Getachew, Michele Joseph, Tsegahun Manyazewal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Cameroon | 1 | 14% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 14% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Lecturer | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2021.
All research outputs
#13,786,529
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,161
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,352
of 430,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#72
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.