You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psycho-physiological assessment of a prosthetic hand sensory feedback system based on an auditory display: a preliminary study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-9-33 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jose Gonzalez, Hirokazu Soma, Masashi Sekine, Wenwei Yu |
| Abstract |
Prosthetic hand users have to rely extensively on visual feedback, which seems to lead to a high conscious burden for the users, in order to manipulate their prosthetic devices. Indirect methods (electro-cutaneous, vibrotactile, auditory cues) have been used to convey information from the artificial limb to the amputee, but the usability and advantages of these feedback methods were explored mainly by looking at the performance results, not taking into account measurements of the user's mental effort, attention, and emotions. The main objective of this study was to explore the feasibility of using psycho-physiological measurements to assess cognitive effort when manipulating a robot hand with and without the usage of a sensory substitution system based on auditory feedback, and how these psycho-physiological recordings relate to temporal and grasping performance in a static setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 182 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 80 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#885
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,355
of 180,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.