You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s43058-021-00137-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Celia Laur, Ann Marie Corrado, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Noah Ivers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 9 | 36% |
Australia | 3 | 12% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 68% |
Scientists | 5 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Librarian | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 25% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,507,771
of 25,186,033 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#84
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,146
of 433,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,186,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.