↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transesophageal echocardiography in patients with prosthetic valve paravalvular leaks: towards an accurate quantification and stratification

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transesophageal echocardiography in patients with prosthetic valve paravalvular leaks: towards an accurate quantification and stratification
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12968-021-00722-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maciej Haberka, Magdalena Malczewska, Piotr Pysz, Michał Kozłowski, Wojciech Wojakowski, Grzegorz Smolka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 45%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#17,396,702
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,086
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,507
of 453,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#31
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.