↓ Skip to main content

Short-term effects of high-dose oral vitamin D3 in critically ill vitamin D deficient patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short-term effects of high-dose oral vitamin D3 in critically ill vitamin D deficient patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study
Published in
Critical Care, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Amrein, Harald Sourij, Gerit Wagner, Alexander Holl, Thomas R Pieber, Karl Heinz Smolle, Tatjana Stojakovic, Christian Schnedl, Harald Dobnig

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency is encountered frequently in critically ill patients and might be harmful. Current nutrition guidelines recommend very low vitamin D doses. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single oral high-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in an intensive care setting over a one-week observation period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 148 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 19%
Other 17 11%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,714,335
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,134
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,246
of 120,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#27
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.