↓ Skip to main content

Status of gastric lavage in neonates born with meconium stained amniotic fluid: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Italian Journal of Pediatrics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Status of gastric lavage in neonates born with meconium stained amniotic fluid: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Italian Journal of Pediatrics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13052-015-0194-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lokraj Shah, Gauri Shankar Shah, Rupa Rajbhandari Singh, Hanoon Pokharel, Om Prakash Mishra

Abstract

Neonates born with meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) can develop feed intolerance during first few days of post -natal period. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with the objectives of to find out the incidence of feed intolerance in vigorous neonates with MSAF who received gastric lavage (GL) as compared to those in whom it was not performed. This was a randomized controlled trial on 500 neonates satisfying the inclusion criteria, 230 were allocated to GL and 270 to no lavage group through computer generated random numbers. No significant difference in the incidence of vomiting was found between GL and no lavage group (8.7 % vs 11.5 %, p = 0.305). Feed intolerance had no relationship with gestational age, gender, birth weight and mode of delivery. No neonates of GL group developed any complications related to the procedure. Thus, it may be concluded that gastric lavage is not required in neonates born with MSAF.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 16 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Psychology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 38%