↓ Skip to main content

Machine learning for subtype definition and risk prediction in heart failure, acute coronary syndromes and atrial fibrillation: systematic review of validity and clinical utility

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Machine learning for subtype definition and risk prediction in heart failure, acute coronary syndromes and atrial fibrillation: systematic review of validity and clinical utility
Published in
BMC Medicine, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12916-021-01940-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amitava Banerjee, Suliang Chen, Ghazaleh Fatemifar, Mohamad Zeina, R. Thomas Lumbers, Johanna Mielke, Simrat Gill, Dipak Kotecha, Daniel F. Freitag, Spiros Denaxas, Harry Hemingway

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 53 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Computer Science 16 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Mathematics 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 56 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,161,154
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,093
of 3,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,031
of 429,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#38
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.