↓ Skip to main content

Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josie Dickerson, Philippa K. Bird, Rosemary R. C. McEachan, Kate E. Pickett, Dagmar Waiblinger, Eleonora Uphoff, Dan Mason, Maria Bryant, Tracey Bywater, Claudine Bowyer-Crane, Pinki Sahota, Neil Small, Michaela Howell, Gill Thornton, Melanie Astin, Debbie A. Lawlor, John Wright

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 288 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 14%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 100 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 14%
Psychology 34 12%
Social Sciences 28 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 108 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,002,824
of 23,650,645 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,068
of 15,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,654
of 370,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#32
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,650,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.