↓ Skip to main content

LEARN 2 MOVE 2-3: a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of child-focused intervention and context-focused intervention in preschool children with cerebral palsy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LEARN 2 MOVE 2-3: a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of child-focused intervention and context-focused intervention in preschool children with cerebral palsy
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-10-80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjolijn Ketelaar, Anne JA Kruijsen, Olaf Verschuren, Marian J Jongmans, Jan Willem Gorter, Johannes Verheijden, Heleen A Reinders-Messelink, Eline Lindeman

Abstract

Little is known about the efficacy and the working mechanisms of physical and occupational therapy interventions for children with cerebral palsy (CP). In recent years a shift from a child-focused intervention approach to a more context-focused intervention approach can be recognized. Until now the evidence on the efficacy and the working mechanisms of these interventions for children with CP is inconclusive. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and working mechanisms of two intervention approaches compared to regular care intervention in improving mobility and self-care skills of children (2-3 years) with CP and their families: a child-focused intervention approach and a context-focused intervention approach.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Zambia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 201 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 42 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 16%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Psychology 10 5%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 50 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,319,742
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,334
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,702
of 100,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.