↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of acupuncture in treating chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 1,627)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of acupuncture in treating chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1749-799x-7-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda J P Hutchinson, Simon Ball, Jeremy C H Andrews, Gareth G Jones

Abstract

Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder defined as pain and soreness, muscle tension, or stiffness in the lumbosacral area of the spine which does not have a specific cause. Low back pain results in high health costs and incapacity to work causing an economic burden to society. The optimal management of non-specific low back pain appears to be undecided. Recently published guidelines support the use of acupuncture for treating non-specific low back pain and it has become a popular alternative treatment modality for patients with low back pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 261 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 75 28%
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 49 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Sports and Recreations 8 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 53 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,332,966
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#34
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,233
of 202,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them