You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effectiveness of acupuncture in treating chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-799x-7-36 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amanda J P Hutchinson, Simon Ball, Jeremy C H Andrews, Gareth G Jones |
Abstract |
Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder defined as pain and soreness, muscle tension, or stiffness in the lumbosacral area of the spine which does not have a specific cause. Low back pain results in high health costs and incapacity to work causing an economic burden to society. The optimal management of non-specific low back pain appears to be undecided. Recently published guidelines support the use of acupuncture for treating non-specific low back pain and it has become a popular alternative treatment modality for patients with low back pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 261 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 75 | 28% |
Student > Master | 41 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
Other | 19 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
Other | 42 | 16% |
Unknown | 49 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
Psychology | 8 | 3% |
Other | 34 | 13% |
Unknown | 53 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,332,966
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#34
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,233
of 202,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them