↓ Skip to main content

Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2019 Case of the Week series

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2019 Case of the Week series
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12968-020-00671-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arun Dahiya, Charles Chao, John Younger, Julia Kar, Bryant M. Baldwin, Michael V. Cohen, Shane Joseph, Anam Chowdhry, Maria S. Figarola, Christopher Malozzi, M. Farhan Nasser, Yassar Nabeel, Rajiv Shah, J. Michael Kennen, Ashish Aneja, Sameh Khalil, Sara Ragab, Omnia Mohammed, Taher Moustafa, Ahmed Hamdy, Shimaa Ahmed, Ahmed Heny, Maha Taher, Madhusudan Ganigara, Arushi Dhar, Nilanjana Misra, Jafar Alzubi, Kurian Pannikottu, Ahmad Jabri, Vinayak Hedge, Anmar Kanaa'n, Joseph Lahorra, Dominique de Waard, David Horne, Santokh Dhillon, Aoife Sweeney, Christian Hamilton-Craig, V.S. Katikireddi, Allan J. Wesley, Chris Hammet, Jason N. Johnson, Sylvia S.M. Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Librarian 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unknown 12 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,267,952
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#174
of 1,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,324
of 457,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.