↓ Skip to main content

Intimate partner violence and use of reproductive health services among married women: evidence from a national Bangladeshi sample

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intimate partner violence and use of reproductive health services among married women: evidence from a national Bangladeshi sample
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-913
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mosiur Rahman, Keiko Nakamura, Kaoruko Seino, Masashi Kizuki

Abstract

Data from a statewide survey in India and clinic-based studies in developed settings have previously suggested an association between maternal physical intimate partner violence (IPV) experiences and the low use of antenatal care (ANC). This study aimed to explore the association between maternal experiences of physical and sexual IPV and the use of reproductive health care services, using a large nationally representative data set from Bangladesh.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 190 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 60 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 17%
Social Sciences 24 12%
Psychology 18 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 63 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2012.
All research outputs
#18,319,742
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,766
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,092
of 183,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#238
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.