You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of the Spanish version of the Lawton IADL Scale for its application in elderly people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-10-130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Itziar Vergara, Amaia Bilbao, Miren Orive, Susana Garcia-Gutierrez, Gemma Navarro, José María Quintana |
| Abstract |
The adequate information about the functional capacity of elderly populations is a key for the comprehensive assessment of their health status and autonomy. The Lawton IADL (instrumental activities of daily living) Scale is a very often used scale to assess independent living skills, but has never been validated for its use in Spanish-speaking populations. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity, the reliability, and responsiveness of this widely used scale. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 327 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 96 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 19% |
| Psychology | 27 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 115 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#849
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,719
of 202,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.