You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endurance training of respiratory muscles improves cycling performance in fit young cyclists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Physiology, May 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6793-4-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paige Holm, Angela Sattler, Ralph F Fregosi |
| Abstract |
Whether or not isolated endurance training of the respiratory muscles improves whole-body endurance exercise performance is controversial, with some studies reporting enhancements of 50% or more, and others reporting no change. Twenty fit (VO2 max 56.0 ml/kg/min), experienced cyclists were randomly assigned to three groups. The experimental group (n = 10) trained their respiratory muscles via 20, 45 min sessions of hyperpnea. The placebo group (n = 4) underwent "sham" training (20, 5 min sessions), and the control group (n = 6) did no training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Croatia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 85% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 70% |
| Researcher | 22 | 55% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 48% |
| Other | 11 | 28% |
| Other | 45 | 113% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 56 | 140% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 90% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 30% |
| Engineering | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 20 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Physiology
#52
of 88 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,835
of 63,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Physiology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.