↓ Skip to main content

Trust and professionalism in science: medical codes as a model for scientific negligence?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trust and professionalism in science: medical codes as a model for scientific negligence?
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12910-021-00610-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugh Desmond, Kris Dierickx

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 19 66%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 19 66%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,746,209
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#288
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,953
of 436,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.