You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Céline Gélinas, Mélanie Bérubé, Kathleen A. Puntillo, Madalina Boitor, Melissa Richard-Lalonde, Francis Bernard, Virginie Williams, Aaron M. Joffe, Craig Steiner, Rebekah Marsh, Louise Rose, Craig M. Dale, Darina M. Tsoller, Manon Choinière, David L. Streiner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 51 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 51 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,210,470
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,003
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,211
of 455,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#57
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.