↓ Skip to main content

Acculturation and self-rated health among Arctic indigenous peoples: a population-based cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acculturation and self-rated health among Arctic indigenous peoples: a population-based cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-948
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bent-Martin Eliassen, Tonje Braaten, Marita Melhus, Ketil Lenert Hansen, Ann Ragnhild Broderstad

Abstract

Acculturation is for indigenous peoples related to the process of colonisation over centuries as well as the on-going social transition experienced in the Arctic today. Changing living conditions and lifestyle affect health in numerous ways in Arctic indigenous populations. Self-rated health (SRH) is a relevant variable in primary health care and in general public health assessments and monitoring. Exploring the relationship between acculturation and SRH in indigenous populations having experienced great societal and cultural change is thus of great importance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,962,021
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,712
of 16,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,084
of 190,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#172
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.