↓ Skip to main content

Facilitating harmonized data quality assessments. A data quality framework for observational health research data collections with software implementations in R

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facilitating harmonized data quality assessments. A data quality framework for observational health research data collections with software implementations in R
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01252-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carsten Oliver Schmidt, Stephan Struckmann, Cornelia Enzenbach, Achim Reineke, Jürgen Stausberg, Stefan Damerow, Marianne Huebner, Börge Schmidt, Willi Sauerbrei, Adrian Richter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 44 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 12 13%
Engineering 5 5%
Mathematics 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 46 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,305,179
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#314
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,471
of 457,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.