You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The potential dangers of not understanding COVID-19 public health restrictions in dementia: “It’s a groundhog day – every single day she does not understand why she can’t go out for a walk”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-10815-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clarissa Giebel, Kerry Hanna, Manoj Rajagopal, Aravind Komuravelli, Jacqueline Cannon, Justine Shenton, Ruth Eley, Anna Gaughan, Steve Callaghan, Hilary Tetlow, Stan Limbert, Rosie Whittington, Carol Rogers, Kym Ward, Lisa Shaw, Sarah Butchard, Mark Gabbay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 27 | 52% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 67% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#980,358
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,075
of 17,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,990
of 453,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#34
of 431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.