You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The assessment of a manikin-based low-dose, high-frequency cardiac resuscitation quality improvement program in early UK adopter hospitals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-021-00168-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine Kuyt, Montana Mullen, Catherine Fullwood, Todd P. Chang, James Fenwick, Victoria Withey, Rod McIntosh, Naomi Herz, Ralph James MacKinnon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,032,378
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#191
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,378
of 434,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.