You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Instruments to measure fear of COVID-19: a diagnostic systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-021-01262-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley Elizabeth Muller, Jan Peter William Himmels, Stijn Van de Velde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,096,318
of 25,321,938 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#282
of 2,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,323
of 433,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,321,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.