↓ Skip to main content

Evolution@home: Global computing quantifies evolution due to Muller's ratchet

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution@home: Global computing quantifies evolution due to Muller's ratchet
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-6-s3-p18
Authors

Laurence Loewe

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,074
of 7,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,873
of 59,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.