You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variations in the estimated intake of acrylamide from food in the Japanese population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00534-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kumiko Kito, Junko Ishihara, Junpei Yamamoto, Takayuki Hosoda, Ayaka Kotemori, Ribeka Takachi, Kazutoshi Nakamura, Junta Tanaka, Taiki Yamaji, Taichi Shimazu, Yuri Ishii, Norie Sawada, Motoki Iwasaki, Hiroyasu Iso, Tomotaka Sobue, Shoichiro Tsugane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#20,595,258
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,351
of 1,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,810
of 368,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.