You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
False positive PCR detection of Tropheryma whipplei in the saliva of healthy people
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Microbiology, May 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-7-48 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean-Marc Rolain, Florence Fenollar, Didier Raoult |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 19% |
Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2011.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#879
of 3,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,380
of 71,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.