You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Diabetes Pearl: Diabetes biobanking in The Netherlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-949 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esther van’t Riet, Miranda T Schram, Evertine J Abbink, Wanda M Admiraal, Marja W Dijk-Schaap, Frits Holleman, Giel Nijpels, Behiye Özcan, Hanno Pijl, Nicolaas C Schaper, Eric JG Sijbrands, Bianca Silvius, Cees J Tack, Harold W de Valk, Bruce HR Wolffenbuttel, Coen DA Stehouwer, Jacqueline M Dekker |
| Abstract |
Type 2 diabetes is associated with considerable comorbidity and severe complications, which reduce quality of life of the patients and require high levels of healthcare. The Diabetes Pearl is a large cohort of patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, covering different geographical areas in the Netherlands. The aim of the study is to create a research infrastructure that will allow the study of risk factors, including biomarkers and genetic determinants for severe diabetes complications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 65 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2012.
All research outputs
#13,370,975
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,470
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,700
of 183,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#144
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.