↓ Skip to main content

An attempt to construct a 7-item short version of the temperament and character inventory to predict the treatment response of patients with depression; a validation study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An attempt to construct a 7-item short version of the temperament and character inventory to predict the treatment response of patients with depression; a validation study
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0997-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetsu Tomita, Norio Yasui-Furukori, Ayako Kaneda, Masamichi Ishioka, Norio Sugawara, Taku Nakagami, Kazuhiko Nakamura

Abstract

The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) is a psychological test that is frequently used to assess personality traits. Many studies have shown the potential of the inventory to predict the treatment response of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Previously, we showed the association between 10 items of the TCI and the treatment response. In the present study, we reanalyzed the 10 items and aimed to provide cut-off values. This work is a secondary analysis of previously published work. Seventy-three patients were enrolled in the previously done study. Participants were treated with 10-40 mg/day of paroxetine for six weeks, and then the participants completed the TCI. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was used to evaluate depression. The participants were divided into two groups (responders and non-responders). Using chi-squared tests, we reanalyzed the 10 items that had the strongest association with the treatment response in the previous study. We rated the answers to each item associated with the treatment response as a "1", and the answers associated with a non-response were rated as a "0". We calculated predictive scores using 10 models. Each model consisted of 1-10 scores of the best 1-10 items. We defined cut-off values for predicting treatment responses using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Ranked by the strength of the association with the treatment response, items 174, 137, 70, 237, 106, 191, 34, 232, 161, and 215 of the TCI significantly predicted treatment responses. All predictive scores from models 1 to 10 significantly predicted treatment responses. The predictive score threshold of model 7 was 3/4, with an area under the curve of 0.825, and this model showed the highest odds and likelihood ratios (19.3 and 8.86, respectively). We might predict the treatment response of patients with MDD using TCI predictive scoring, including items 174, 137, 70, 237, 106, 191, and 34 and a cut-off value of 3/4.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,210
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,224
of 4,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,454
of 355,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#95
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.