↓ Skip to main content

Medical telerobotic systems: current status and future trends

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical telerobotic systems: current status and future trends
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12938-016-0217-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sotiris Avgousti, Eftychios G. Christoforou, Andreas S. Panayides, Sotos Voskarides, Cyril Novales, Laurence Nouaille, Constantinos S. Pattichis, Pierre Vieyres

Abstract

Teleoperated medical robotic systems allow procedures such as surgeries, treatments, and diagnoses to be conducted across short or long distances while utilizing wired and/or wireless communication networks. This study presents a systematic review of the relevant literature between the years 2004 and 2015, focusing on medical teleoperated robotic systems which have witnessed tremendous growth over the examined period. A thorough insight of telerobotics systems discussing design concepts, enabling technologies (namely robotic manipulation, telecommunications, and vision systems), and potential applications in clinical practice is provided, while existing limitations and future trends are also highlighted. A representative paradigm of the short-distance case is the da Vinci Surgical System which is described in order to highlight relevant issues. The long-distance telerobotics concept is exemplified through a case study on diagnostic ultrasound scanning. Moreover, the present review provides a classification into short- and long-distance telerobotic systems, depending on the distance from which they are operated. Telerobotic systems are further categorized with respect to their application field. For the reviewed systems are also examined their engineering characteristics and the employed robotics technology. The current status of the field, its significance, the potential, as well as the challenges that lie ahead are thoroughly discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 298 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 13%
Student > Master 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Researcher 31 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 93 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 98 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Computer Science 20 7%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 102 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,801,268
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#175
of 850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,835
of 362,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 850 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.