You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study protocol: evaluation of sheds for life (SFL): a community-based men’s health initiative designed “for shedders by shedders” in Irish Men’s sheds using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-10823-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aisling McGrath, Niamh Murphy, Noel Richardson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 10 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,455,368
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,594
of 15,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,504
of 436,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#55
of 428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.