You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening for in planta protein-protein interactions combining bimolecular fluorescence complementation with flow cytometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-8-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth Wayne Berendzen, Maik Böhmer, Niklas Wallmeroth, Sébastien Peter, Marko Vesić, Ying Zhou, Franziska KatharinaElisabeth Tiesler, Frank Schleifenbaum, Klaus Harter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 26% |
| Researcher | 25 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 64% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#515
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,511
of 165,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.