You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Diagnostic delays in vasculitis and factors associated with time to diagnosis
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, April 2021
Antoine G. Sreih, Keri Cronin, Dianne G. Shaw, Kalen Young, Cristina Burroughs, Joyce Kullman, Kirthi Machireddy, Carol A. McAlear, Peter A. Merkel
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||7||78%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||11%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||6%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||6%|
|Student > Master||2||6%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||8||24%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||3%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,162,141 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
of 2,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 428,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,162,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.