You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation and standardization of DNA extraction and library construction methods for metagenomics-based human fecal microbiome measurements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-021-01048-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dieter M. Tourlousse, Koji Narita, Takamasa Miura, Mitsuo Sakamoto, Akiko Ohashi, Keita Shiina, Masami Matsuda, Daisuke Miura, Mamiko Shimamura, Yoshifumi Ohyama, Atsushi Yamazoe, Yoshihito Uchino, Keishi Kameyama, Shingo Arioka, Jiro Kataoka, Takayoshi Hisada, Kazuyuki Fujii, Shunsuke Takahashi, Miho Kuroiwa, Masatomo Rokushima, Mitsue Nishiyama, Yoshiki Tanaka, Takuya Fuchikami, Hitomi Aoki, Satoshi Kira, Ryo Koyanagi, Takeshi Naito, Morie Nishiwaki, Hirotaka Kumagai, Mikiko Konda, Ken Kasahara, Moriya Ohkuma, Hiroko Kawasaki, Yuji Sekiguchi, Jun Terauchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 14% |
| India | 2 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,189,085
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,184
of 1,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,674
of 434,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#58
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.