You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Major complications of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary cohort of patients with testicular cancer and a review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12957-020-02032-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christian Guido Ruf, Simon Krampe, Cord Matthies, Petra Anheuser, Tim Nestler, Jörg Simon, Hendrik Isbarn, Klaus Peter Dieckmann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Researcher | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,588,546
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#185
of 2,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,600
of 409,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,081 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.