↓ Skip to main content

Man or machine? Impact of tutor-guided versus simulator-guided short-time bronchoscopy training on students learning outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Man or machine? Impact of tutor-guided versus simulator-guided short-time bronchoscopy training on students learning outcomes
Published in
BMC Medical Education, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12909-021-02526-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anke Schertel, Thomas Geiser, Wolf E. Hautz

Abstract

Simulation based medical education is efficient for the acquisition of flexible bronchoscopy navigational skills and the knowledge of the tracheobronchial anatomy. However, bronchoscopy simulator training is not routinely integrated into pneumologic fellowship programs or undergraduate medical education for time and/or cost reasons. Our study compares the effect of self-guided bronchoscopy simulator training versus tutor guided training on the acquisition of navigational skills and knowledge of the bronchial anatomy. Third-year undergraduate medical students were randomized to either a tutor- or simulator guided bronchoscopy simulator training focusing on the acquisition of navigational skills and the knowledge of the tracheobronchial anatomy. Every student performed a baseline bronchoscopy followed by a structured bronchoscopy simulator training and finally an assessment bronchoscopy at the end of the training program. Groups were compared by means of a repeated measurement ANOVA and effect sizes calculated as Cohens' d. Fifty-four eligible students participated in the study. Knowledge of the tracheobronchial anatomy significantly increased from pre- to post training (all p < 0.001; all d > 2), navigational skills significantly decreased (all p < 0.005; all d < 1). There were no significant differences between groups. Instruction by the simulator as well as by the tutor was rated as helpful by the students. Twenty-two (84.6%) of the participants of the simulator guided group would have appreciated an additional instruction by a tutor. Short-time simulator guided bronchoscopy training improves knowledge of the tracheobronchial anatomy in novice bronchoscopists as much as tutor guided training, but navigational skills seem to worsen in both groups. Further studies assessing transfer to clinical practice are needed to find the optimal teaching method for basic flexible bronchoscopy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 35%