↓ Skip to main content

How to design a registry for undiagnosed patients in the framework of rare disease diagnosis: suggestions on software, data set and coding system

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to design a registry for undiagnosed patients in the framework of rare disease diagnosis: suggestions on software, data set and coding system
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13023-021-01831-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Berger, Anne-Kathrin Rustemeier, Jens Göbel, Dennis Kadioglu, Vanessa Britz, Katharina Schubert, Klaus Mohnike, Holger Storf, Thomas O. F. Wagner

Abstract

About 30 million people in the EU and USA, respectively, suffer from a rare disease. Driven by European legislative requirements, national strategies for the improvement of care in rare diseases are being developed. To improve timely and correct diagnosis for patients with rare diseases, the development of a registry for undiagnosed patients was recommended by the German National Action Plan. In this paper we focus on the question on how such a registry for undiagnosed patients can be built and which information it should contain. To develop a registry for undiagnosed patients, a software for data acquisition and storage, an appropriate data set and an applicable terminology/classification system for the data collected are needed. We have used the open-source software Open-Source Registry System for Rare Diseases (OSSE) to build the registry for undiagnosed patients. Our data set is based on the minimal data set for rare disease patient registries recommended by the European Rare Disease Registries Platform. We extended this Common Data Set to also include symptoms, clinical findings and other diagnoses. In order to ensure findability, comparability and statistical analysis, symptoms, clinical findings and diagnoses have to be encoded. We evaluated three medical ontologies (SNOMED CT, HPO and LOINC) for their usefulness. With exact matches of 98% of tested medical terms, a mean number of five deposited synonyms, SNOMED CT seemed to fit our needs best. HPO and LOINC provided 73% and 31% of exacts matches of clinical terms respectively. Allowing more generic codes for a defined symptom, with SNOMED CT 99%, with HPO 89% and with LOINC 39% of terms could be encoded. With the use of the OSSE software and a data set, which, in addition to the Common Data Set, focuses on symptoms and clinical findings, a functioning and meaningful registry for undiagnosed patients can be implemented. The next step is the implementation of the registry in centres for rare diseases. With the help of medical informatics and big data analysis, case similarity analyses could be realized and aid as a decision-support tool enabling diagnosis of some undiagnosed patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 9 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 39%