↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: The discovery of biological subphenotypes in ARDS: a novel approach to targeted medicine?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: The discovery of biological subphenotypes in ARDS: a novel approach to targeted medicine?
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40560-021-00534-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Wildi, Samantha Livingstone, Chiara Palmieri, Gianluigi LiBassi, Jacky Suen, John Fraser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 60%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Chemical Engineering 1 20%
Chemistry 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#19,514,300
of 24,004,724 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#464
of 539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,166
of 421,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,004,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.