↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and treatment of neurogenic dysphagia – S1 guideline of the German Society of Neurology

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis and treatment of neurogenic dysphagia – S1 guideline of the German Society of Neurology
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s42466-021-00122-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rainer Dziewas, Hans-Dieter Allescher, Ilia Aroyo, Gudrun Bartolome, Ulrike Beilenhoff, Jörg Bohlender, Helga Breitbach-Snowdon, Klemens Fheodoroff, Jörg Glahn, Hans-Jürgen Heppner, Karl Hörmann, Christian Ledl, Christoph Lücking, Peter Pokieser, Joerg C. Schefold, Heidrun Schröter-Morasch, Kathi Schweikert, Roland Sparing, Michaela Trapl-Grundschober, Claus Wallesch, Tobias Warnecke, Cornelius J. Werner, Johannes Weßling, Rainer Wirth, Christina Pflug

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 9 6%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 66 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Design 2 1%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 71 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#18,143,395
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#107
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,288
of 439,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.