↓ Skip to main content

Patient directed self management of pain (PaDSMaP) compared to treatment as usual following total knee replacement: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient directed self management of pain (PaDSMaP) compared to treatment as usual following total knee replacement: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Donell, Katherine Deane, Louise Swift, Garry Barton, Paula Balls, Clare Darrah, Richard Gray

Abstract

In 2009, 665 patients underwent total knee replacements (TKRs) at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (NNUH), representing nearly 1% of the national total. Pain control following the operation can be poor, and this can cause poor mobilization and potential long-term adverse events. Although high levels of pain are not associated with patient dissatisfaction, brief periods of pain may lead to neuronal remodeling and sensitization. Patient controlled oral analgesia (PCOA) may improve pain relief; however, the evidence to date has been inconclusive. Patient directed self management of pain (PaDSMaP) is a single center randomized controlled trial, which aims to establish if patient self-medication improves, or is equivalent to, treatment as usual and to create an educational package to allow implementation elsewhere.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 43 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 16%
Psychology 9 7%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 45 34%